Home |Contact Us | Site Map

 

Readers Write Index

 


Kyon Na Hindi Me Likhen?

by Rakesh Chaubey

January 19, 2005

Readers Write

 

Bahte paani ke saamne jab koi baadha aati hai, to pani us baadha ko paar karne ka raasta dhoondh leta hai. Aaj Windows Operating System mein har bhasha ke font uplabdh hain, parantu Hindi bhasha ka koi aisa font nahin aaya hai jo ki istemal mein bhe asaan ho aur jo lokpriya bhi ho. Is awrodh ka to main ne hi nahin, bahut logon ne saalon pehle hal dhoondh liya tha - yehi ki Hindi bhasha Roman lipi mein likki jaye. Is vidhi ka prayog main ne apne pariwar ke anya sadasyon ko email bhejne mein sabse pahle kiya tha. Main ne paya ki sab ise asaani se parh sakte hain aur pasand bhi karte hain.

Ab choonki Microsoft Hindi font ko (istemal ke drishtikon se) saral banayega nahin. Anya desi log paise kamaane ke chakkar mein font par copyright rakkhenge, to kyon nahin hum log Roman lipi mein Hindi likh kar apne bhawanaon ki abhiwyaki karen?

Hum me se bahut Bihari log Angrezi bhasha me patu na hone ke karan PD mein likh nahin paate. Siddhantwash aisa nahin hona chaahiye. Agar baat mein dam ho, agar baat mein vidwata jhalakti ho, aur agar baat shisht roop se kahi jaye, to bhasha-rupi badha ko beech mein nahin aane dena chaahiye.

Agar Sampadak ji mujhse is baat par sahmat hon aur is chote lekh ko prakashit karen, to na hi ye PD ka pehla Hindi lekh hoga, balki, yah is dhaarna ko bhi galat siddh kar dega ki vidwata par kewal Angrezi ki hi dakkhal hai. Hum Bihari log hain. Hindi mein abhiwyakti nitaant awashyak hai kyon ki isi jariye se hamaare logon mein apne bhaasha ke prati ruchi utpann hogi aur gaurav barhega.

PD ke pathakon ke samaksh ye soojh (idea) prastut hai. Pathakon ke tippaniyon, prasanshaon aur alochnaon se pata chalega ki Roman lipi ka Hindi likhne mein istemal lokpriya hoga ya nahin.

 

Comments:
Meri umra 70 ke lagbhag ho gai hai aur mai pichhle kareeb 7 varshon se apne logon ko barabar Roman Bhasha mein hi e'mail karta aya hoon.

Doosri baat yeh hai ki aapka soojhao (idea) sahi hote hue bhi kuchh-ek karanon se practical nahin hai. Aapne khud hi kaha ki Bihari logon ko Angrezi bhasha mein patuta nahin hai. Maanta hoon. Aur jab wo ek maamooli word ka bhi spelling nahin likh sakte to kya Roman bhasha mein Hindi likhna, Angrezi key board dwara, aasaan hoga? Mujhe to sandeh hai. Vaise aapka sujhao theek hai agar log apna sakein par yaad rahe ki yah aasaan nahin hai aur yeh aap bhi jaante hain. - Virendra 1/19/2005


Dear Rakesh, your idea is brilliant but I think PD will face the problem in editing it.

For example, in absence of standardization how spell check will be done? Moreover it's altogether different matter to write a personal and small Hindi email using roman script and writing comparatively long and standard article the same way. I think it is difficult to read Hindi in roman script, may be because right from childhood we always read Hindi in Devnagri script. To conclude a word, one has to scan all the alphabets. This may put eyes to lot of stress, if the article is long.

It will be a good idea if PD itself or one of the readers among us can provide PD with software which will convert Hindi document typed in roman to Devnagri and then publish it. It will be easy to read. I have seen such software for Kannada. - Ramdev Yadav 1/19/2005


Bhai Rakesh ji,

saMyoga se aapaka lekha maiMne paRha. main aapse sahamata huun, 100 nahiin 200 fii sadii. main pichale 38 varshon se Japan men rahataa huun magara merii maatrti bhaashaa aba bhii ilahabada ki avadhi aura banarasa ki bhojapuri hii hai! kucha varsha hue, main Brazil gaya thaa, unakii bhaasha purtagali mujhe nahiin aati, angrezi unhen nahin -- vahan bhi merii bhojapuri cala jaatii!

apani maan yadi kuruupa ho to kya use hama maan nahin kahate?

baRe kheda ki baata hai, eka hama bhaarata hi ke loga apanii maatri bhaasha se katarate hain!

hindi kisii bhii varnamala men likhi jaakara bhii hindi hi rahegi.

sapriti, aapaka,

akshmidhara malaviya, Kyoto, Japan 1/20/2005


"Kyon Na Hindi Men Likhen?" This question reminds me of the following lines from Ghalib's Poetry:

"Kyon Na Firdous Men Dozakh Ko Mila Len Ya Rabb!
Sair Ke Liye Thodi Si Faza Aur Sahi !"

These days, this generation communicates in mixed Hindi and English or to say "Hinglish" and it is up to the individual to maintain the purity of the language. Of course, it depends on the individual's choice or comfort with the language to express his or her inner feelings and views in English or Hindi medium. Someone might find it like nothing but "Heaven" or "Hell" or somebody would wish to merge the heaven with hell in order to write Hindi in Roman, the way as one writer recently suggested. But it would be like an illusion to have fresh air in Hell, for many people who believe in keeping the Hindi language as a powerful source of medium and our Indian identity.

Incidentally, as far as our lingua franca is concerned, writing in the roman script was first suggested by Subhash Chandra Bose in his first presidential address to the Congress in 1938 session. In his opinion, distinction between Hindi and Urdu was artificial one, separated by the script and Subhash Bose proposed mixing Hindi and Urdu as spoken by large portions of the country as common language. He was aware that people in India would strongly favour either Devnagri or Arabic/Urdu script and he was aware that there would be no provision for exclusion of any scripts. He suggested to adopt Roman script to unite the both sectors as well as to him a common script would bring India closer to the International community. Like many younger generations of Hindus and Muslims, at that time he was obviously impressed by Kemal Pasha of Turkey who, as a dictator, had forced his modern visions and policy of secularism as well as using the Roman script as he wanted his country to "elevate" to European culture in looks and behavior. It is worth mentioning that even after so many years the European Union has not included Turkey in its family group of nations of Europe!

In my opinion any language takes its own time to develop and grow. Although, it is not possible to bring out in translation the beauty of any language, using script other than its own would not limit in expression to a certain extent. However, slowly it will open the door to corrupt or deface the language itself. The English language adopts foreign words and behaves as if it belonged to their own lingua franca, which makes it a very smooth in usage and ends up in increasing its popularity as well. Similarly, to improve Hindi for non-Hindi speaking population or expand its uses in day to day work one should work to simplify it by adopting new words if possible but not at the cost of butchering the language itself.

I am not a linguist or any professional writer in any language, but what I see in Hindi (books and print media), it has gradually adopted English style numbers/figures, punctuation marks like period/dot(.) instead of (I) as purnaviram. In the name of "modernizing Hindi", many Hindi lovers like myself feel kind of horror when we hear the adoption of the Roman script now. Probably no literature is richer than the Sanskrit. However, we know that a simpler form of language from Sanskrit emerged in successive generations like Pali, Prakrit, and many more in our history to present day Hindi language. Over five hundred years back Sant Tulisidas was ridiculed by then Sanskrit Scholars for not writing his RAMCHARITMANAS in Sanskrit. However it is known to everybody the wide acceptability his Ramayan in the minds and hearts of millions of people even today, because it is written in simple language than Sanskrit.

Who knows what future holds for modern Hindi? But any encouragement to replace the script will be eventually a fatal one as without its own script any language is not a language but just a dialect.

We are fortunate in belonging to India "a rainbow nation" where there are so many equally beautiful and rich languages beside Hindi being shared by millions to communicate expressions and feelings and all these literature vibrate with vigor and have a place in the hearts and the minds of millions.

One should take further steps, not to just keep Hindi alive but promote its beauty in younger generation so that we don't find Hindi in the history books in the future or let this be spoken like like "Bombaiya Hindi" as spoken by the actors in so called several "Hindi" movies like Munna Bhai MBBS- Bole to roman men likhenga aur apun bolenga bhi to apun ko aisa lagta hai bhaay, hindi ko Vat lag jayenga-kya bolta hai?

As they say English rulers left India but the English- ness remained in India. Another way to look at this angle would be to quote Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee as he jokingly said: "English rulers were not driven out of India, rather they fled India to save their English language from the Indians."

The length of time that English has been in India, its importance and its range both socially and geographically, its place in sociolinguistic link could not be ignored.

An estimated over 30 million people regularly use English (to be more accurate-Indian English) language in India; making India the third largest English Speaking country in the world.

It is not easy to separate the use of English in India from the general multilingual flux. In addition to the great variety of mixed and adapted usage of hybrids, many words from other languages are constantly drawn into English and today English and Hindi are the link languages in a complex multilingual society in India as well as many countries with population originating from the Indian sub-continent.

Keeping these facts in mind, it is very important that there should be no more pressure on Hindi language to drop its Devnagri script which is like a backbone of any language to hold and keep the language alive. - Raj Shekhar, Toronto, Canada, 1/21/2005


I read the comment/reply letter by Raj Shekhar on the issue of writing Hindi in Roman script which was an eye opener for me. Coming from non- Hindi speaking background and learning Hindi myself, I realized and learned so many facts in a such short but informative letter. Other readers should also learn so many good points as made by the writer against using Roman script. I wish that you would put this comment in a new format, or to say reprint it in the main heading under "Readers Write" column so that it reaches other readers like me to know the importance of Hindi in keeping its script. I did a quick survey by calling my friends and majority of them did not notice this letter as it was buried under "comment on topic". Good luck! - Olivia King 1/22/05

Editor's reply: Wait no more, Ms. King. You'll find Mr. Shekhar's article in its entirety right here. Thanks for you comments. We're sure Mr. Shekhar would also like to thank you. - 1/22/05

Discussion on this topic is now closed.

Return to previous Page

 

 

All rights reserved, 2000-2006, PatnaDaily.Com.