|
Meri umra 70 ke lagbhag ho gai hai
aur mai pichhle kareeb 7 varshon se
apne logon ko barabar Roman Bhasha
mein hi e'mail karta aya hoon.
Doosri baat yeh hai ki aapka soojhao
(idea) sahi hote hue bhi kuchh-ek
karanon se practical nahin hai.
Aapne khud hi kaha ki Bihari logon
ko Angrezi bhasha mein patuta nahin
hai. Maanta hoon. Aur jab wo ek
maamooli word ka bhi spelling nahin
likh sakte to kya Roman bhasha mein
Hindi likhna, Angrezi key board
dwara, aasaan hoga? Mujhe to sandeh
hai. Vaise aapka sujhao theek hai
agar log apna sakein par yaad rahe
ki yah aasaan nahin hai aur yeh aap
bhi jaante hain. - Virendra
1/19/2005
Dear Rakesh, your idea is brilliant
but I think PD will face the problem
in editing it.
For
example, in absence of
standardization how spell check will
be done? Moreover it's altogether
different matter to write a personal
and small Hindi email using roman
script and writing comparatively
long and standard article the same
way. I think it is difficult to read
Hindi in roman script, may be
because right from childhood we
always read Hindi in Devnagri
script. To conclude a word, one has
to scan all the alphabets. This may
put eyes to lot of stress, if the
article is long.
It
will be a good idea if PD itself or
one of the readers among us can
provide PD with software which will
convert Hindi document typed in
roman to Devnagri and then publish
it. It will be easy to read. I have
seen such software for Kannada. -
Ramdev Yadav 1/19/2005
Bhai Rakesh ji,
saMyoga se aapaka lekha maiMne paRha.
main aapse sahamata huun, 100 nahiin
200 fii sadii. main pichale 38
varshon se Japan men rahataa huun
magara merii maatrti bhaashaa aba
bhii ilahabada ki avadhi aura
banarasa ki bhojapuri hii hai! kucha
varsha hue, main Brazil gaya thaa,
unakii bhaasha purtagali mujhe
nahiin aati, angrezi unhen nahin --
vahan bhi merii bhojapuri cala
jaatii!
apani maan yadi kuruupa ho to kya
use hama maan nahin kahate?
baRe kheda ki baata hai, eka hama
bhaarata hi ke loga apanii maatri
bhaasha se katarate hain!
hindi kisii bhii varnamala men likhi
jaakara bhii hindi hi rahegi.
sapriti, aapaka,
akshmidhara malaviya, Kyoto, Japan
1/20/2005
"Kyon Na Hindi Men Likhen?" This
question reminds me of the following
lines from Ghalib's Poetry:
"Kyon
Na Firdous Men Dozakh Ko Mila Len Ya
Rabb!
Sair Ke Liye Thodi Si Faza Aur Sahi
!"
These days, this generation
communicates in mixed Hindi and
English or to say "Hinglish" and it
is up to the individual to maintain
the purity of the language. Of
course, it depends on the
individual's choice or comfort with
the language to express his or her
inner feelings and views in English
or Hindi medium. Someone might find
it like nothing but "Heaven" or
"Hell" or somebody would wish to
merge the heaven with hell in order
to write Hindi in Roman, the way as
one writer recently suggested. But
it would be like an illusion to have
fresh air in Hell, for many people
who believe in keeping the Hindi
language as a powerful source of
medium and our Indian identity.
Incidentally, as far as our lingua
franca is concerned, writing in the
roman script was first suggested by
Subhash Chandra Bose in his first
presidential address to the Congress
in 1938 session. In his opinion,
distinction between Hindi and Urdu
was artificial one, separated by the
script and Subhash Bose proposed
mixing Hindi and Urdu as spoken by
large portions of the country as
common language. He was aware that
people in India would strongly
favour either Devnagri or
Arabic/Urdu script and he was aware
that there would be no provision for
exclusion of any scripts. He
suggested to adopt Roman script to
unite the both sectors as well as to
him a common script would bring
India closer to the International
community. Like many younger
generations of Hindus and Muslims,
at that time he was obviously
impressed by Kemal Pasha of Turkey
who, as a dictator, had forced his
modern visions and policy of
secularism as well as using the
Roman script as he wanted his
country to "elevate" to European
culture in looks and behavior. It is
worth mentioning that even after so
many years the European Union has
not included Turkey in its family
group of nations of Europe!
In
my opinion any language takes its
own time to develop and grow.
Although, it is not possible to
bring out in translation the beauty
of any language, using script other
than its own would not limit in
expression to a certain extent.
However, slowly it will open the
door to corrupt or deface the
language itself. The English
language adopts foreign words and
behaves as if it belonged to their
own lingua franca, which makes it a
very smooth in usage and ends up in
increasing its popularity as well.
Similarly, to improve Hindi for
non-Hindi speaking population or
expand its uses in day to day work
one should work to simplify it by
adopting new words if possible but
not at the cost of butchering the
language itself.
I
am not a linguist or any
professional writer in any language,
but what I see in Hindi (books and
print media), it has gradually
adopted English style
numbers/figures, punctuation marks
like period/dot(.) instead of (I) as
purnaviram. In the name of
"modernizing Hindi", many Hindi
lovers like myself feel kind of
horror when we hear the adoption of
the Roman script now. Probably no
literature is richer than the
Sanskrit. However, we know that a
simpler form of language from
Sanskrit emerged in successive
generations like Pali, Prakrit, and
many more in our history to present
day Hindi language. Over five
hundred years back Sant Tulisidas
was ridiculed by then Sanskrit
Scholars for not writing his
RAMCHARITMANAS in Sanskrit. However
it is known to everybody the wide
acceptability his Ramayan in the
minds and hearts of millions of
people even today, because it is
written in simple language than
Sanskrit.
Who
knows what future holds for modern
Hindi? But any encouragement to
replace the script will be
eventually a fatal one as without
its own script any language is not a
language but just a dialect.
We
are fortunate in belonging to India
"a rainbow nation" where there are
so many equally beautiful and rich
languages beside Hindi being shared
by millions to communicate
expressions and feelings and all
these literature vibrate with vigor
and have a place in the hearts and
the minds of millions.
One
should take further steps, not to
just keep Hindi alive but promote
its beauty in younger generation so
that we don't find Hindi in the
history books in the future or let
this be spoken like like "Bombaiya
Hindi" as spoken by the actors in so
called several "Hindi" movies like
Munna Bhai MBBS- Bole to roman men
likhenga aur apun bolenga bhi to
apun ko aisa lagta hai bhaay, hindi
ko Vat lag jayenga-kya bolta hai?
As
they say English rulers left India
but the English- ness remained in
India. Another way to look at this
angle would be to quote Mr. Atal
Bihari Vajpayee as he jokingly said:
"English rulers were not driven out
of India, rather they fled India to
save their English language from the
Indians."
The
length of time that English has been
in India, its importance and its
range both socially and
geographically, its place in
sociolinguistic link could not be
ignored.
An
estimated over 30 million people
regularly use English (to be more
accurate-Indian English) language in
India; making India the third
largest English Speaking country in
the world.
It
is not easy to separate the use of
English in India from the general
multilingual flux. In addition to
the great variety of mixed and
adapted usage of hybrids, many words
from other languages are constantly
drawn into English and today English
and Hindi are the link languages in
a complex multilingual society in
India as well as many countries with
population originating from the
Indian sub-continent.
Keeping these facts in mind, it is
very important that there should be
no more pressure on Hindi language
to drop its Devnagri script which is
like a backbone of any language to
hold and keep the language alive. -
Raj Shekhar, Toronto, Canada,
1/21/2005
I read the comment/reply letter by
Raj Shekhar on the issue of writing
Hindi in Roman script which was an
eye opener for me. Coming from non-
Hindi speaking background and
learning Hindi myself, I realized
and learned so many facts in a such
short but informative letter. Other
readers should also learn so many
good points as made by the writer
against using Roman script. I wish
that you would put this comment in a
new format, or to say reprint it in
the main heading under "Readers
Write" column so that it reaches
other readers like me to know the
importance of Hindi in keeping its
script. I did a quick survey by
calling my friends and majority of
them did not notice this letter as
it was buried under "comment on
topic". Good luck! - Olivia King
1/22/05
Editor's reply: Wait no more, Ms.
King. You'll find Mr. Shekhar's
article in its entirety
right
here.
Thanks for you comments. We're sure
Mr. Shekhar would also like to thank
you. - 1/22/05 |