Home |Contact Us | Site Map

 

Readers Write Index

 


Rural Roads and My Village

by Indra
October 27, 2005

Readers Write

 

I remember in the '70s I used to drive on the bank of the canal to reach my village from GT Road in Sasaram while traveling from Calcutta for a holiday. In those days, the irrigation department used to maintain the bank in good condition. Villagers were really afraid of severe actions if they were caught doing any harm to the bank of the canal even by a very junior employee of the department. But over the years the banks are no more maintained that good. Fault lies with the population living along it. I can't any more drive along it. When I heard of the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana, I was hopeful that things would change soon.

The Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) was launched at the end of 2000 to connect villages that didn't have roads. The roads under the project as reported in media is changing the lives of people and transforming rural India's economic landscape wherever it has reached.

The UPA Government very rightly included rural roads as one of the six key components of the Bharat Nirman Yojna to build rural India. It will now cover 1.72 lakh habitations by 2009. These will be good all-weather roads, complete with cross-drains, covering a total length of 3,70,000 km. In the first phase the habitations with a population of 1,000 or more will be taken up. Villages with more than 500 (250 in case of tough terrain and tribal areas) residents will be connected in the second phase.

The fund comes from the Re 1.50 cess the government collects on the sale of every litre of diesel. 50% of the total collection is allocated to this rural road scheme. The estimated total project cost will be Rs 1,32,000 crore.

An estimated Rs 15,782 crore has already been provided to the scheme since 2000. The State Rural Roads Development Agencies (SSRDA) set up in each state is implementing the scheme. Till July 2005, about 75,560 km (60 per cent-of the road length cleared for construction since 2000) had been built. While Uttar Pradesh has constructed 12,874Km (65%), Karnatala has done 4,492km (74%). Rajasthan with 11,120km (78%), and Madhya Pradesh with 8,127km (55%) are also on move. Tamil Nadu has completed 2,856 km (68%), but West Bengal is pretty behind with 2,472 (50%) of the target. Orissa has reached a figure of 3,865 km (46%), but Maharashtra with 3,004km(58%). Bihar has perhaps just started or thinking to start. Whenever I have enquired about the scheme with whomsoever I meet from the rural Bihar, the reply has been in negative.

For the maintaining the quality of construction, the roads of the PMGSY network are subjected to quality checks by several agencies at the local, state and national levels. The technical institutes like regional engineering colleges and the IITs at Guwahati, Kharagpur and Roorkee are assisting in the task of quality control. According to the three-tier quality control system, 89 per cent of the completed roads and 71 per cent of the works in progress up to March 2005, were satisfactory except for those built in UP. In case a road is found unsatisfactory, the contractor is blacklisted and action is taken against him. All PMGSY roads are covered by a five-year maintenance contract with the same contractor.

The stress on quality is making a big difference. Earlier roads constructed by the PWD used to wear off within months. It is not so now. At the time the launch of the PMGSY, the cost of building was fixed at Rs 14.75 lakh per km. It has now been revised to Rs 21 lakh per km.

Wherever roads are getting laid, farmers are responding to market needs faster and better. Better quality products are reaching the market faster. Cottage industries have sprung up and sales of bicycles have risen in areas where the PMGSY has reached.

Economists say that the rural roads network can usher in all round prosperity without putting too much strain on the exchequer. India has 5.5 lakh villages, some with a population of only 200. Most of these settlements came up because of poor mobility in the hinterland. The number of villages may reduce and so will reduce the need to have so many schools and other public services such as healthcare centers. Some of the findings are surprisingly encouraging: States where rural roads have reached enrolment has improved, especially of girl child. Infant and child mortality down, access to primary health centres, hospitals up. On-farm, non-farm and self-employment opportunities have improved.

Unfortunately many states are not showing the desired interest, as perhaps with better systems in place in PMGSY, the vested interested are not able to earn all that they were doing earlier in PWD road construction. In Bihar, Central agencies such as IRCON and Engineering Projects India had to be roped in for building roads after local contractors refused to pick up tenders. UP has not decided about the quality control agencies, and roads constructed under the scheme had been poor in quality. But it is not at all surprising, as otherwise these two states would not have been vying for the bottom position on all development parameters.

Ironically, the state that needs it the most - Bihar has hardly done anything. Is it not damaging and inexcusable? It would have progressed faster if a right governor would have manned the state during President’s rule. But the people of Bihar perhaps have lost faith in anything but only promises during election campaign.

My village is having a population of more than 3000. My uncle got the village connected with roads coming from two sides that were built under different schemes in perhaps 70s. Some transport - a minibus and two jeeps - plies between famous Sasaram, the district town and the village. But over the years with no repair and damages caused by the habitations that have come up along the road, I can’t manage to reach my village on my Alto. Only tractors and some SUVs can manage to move on that road and that also if the driver is having special skill for the terrain. As per the PMGSY scheme plan, the road would have been improved to the present standard of quality in phase 1 itself. But who will do that if the state doesn’t show any interest in taking up the projects initiated by the center or the World Bank? But the rural population along the road will also have to take pain and change their way of using the road, so that the road remains in good condition for longer period.

 

Comments:
No comment so far.

Click here to send comment on this topic

By sending comments to PatnaDaily.Com, you agree to the conditions listed here.

Return to previous Page

 

 

All rights reserved, 2000-2006, PatnaDaily.Com.