You are right when you say Bihar
does not have an identity that
people are proud of. In fact, this
lack of a sub national identity is
to my mind one of the reasons of its
continued neglect since
independence.
However, Bihar was not carved out
after the '57 gadar.
Bihar was a subah during the Mughal
period. Raja Man Singh was one of
the governor of Bihar. Another
person was Price Azim, the favourite
grandson of Aurangazeb. After the
decline of the Mughal rule, Bihar
fell in the hands of the Nawab of
Bengal with a governor at Patna.
During the early East India Company
rule, there was a residency and
collectorate at Patna.
Bihar lost its identity and Patna
its importance sometime at the
beginning of 1800 and was made a
part of Bengal province. In fact,
Patna came under a district whose
headquarters was Gaya.
Bihar was made a province of the raj
in 1911 after a protracted agitation
where Sachinand Sinha, Raibahadur
Srikrishna Sahay, Mahesh Narain, Ali
Imam and others played a very
prominent role. - T. V. Sinha -
Aug. 30, 2006
My gratitude and regards to Mr. T.
V. Sinha for educating me about the
origin of Bihar.
I am sure this would initiate a
process of inward exploration in
some readers. - Ajay Kapoor -
Aug. 31, 2006
Thanks to Mr. Ajay Kapoor for
writing this article. I’d like to
make a point here that caste is more
an issue in that part of Bihar which
is known as Bihar now. I was born in
Ranchi, and till the age of 10 I was
not aware of the significance of my
last name. Then, my father was
transferred to Darbhanga for the
next four years. The first thing
that I learnt in the school there
was the meaning of my last name.
Later as I grew old, I heard of the
fights between different caste
groups in the medical/engineering
colleges of Bihar (including BIT,
Sindri which is now in Jharkhand).
However, such incidents were less
heard to be taking place in the
Jharkhand part. In the schools and
colleges of the Jharkhand part where
I studied, we never bothered to know
each other’s caste. Lately, we’ve
heard of the tribal and non-tribal
clashes in Jharkhand.
The point I am trying to make here
is that the division in our society
is obvious and the politics is
making it deeper. We are allowing
ourselves to become puppets in the
hands of the politicians. These
politicians lead mobs with some
hired goons to riots and clashes.
Later, such issues are
sensationalized with the help of
media to create a vote bank for
themselves. We feel insecure and
start looking towards these leaders
as our saviors. Politicians’
interests are against the interest
of the society. They don’t want
social equity. In the Jharkhand
part, caste politics will not work
out because of the social
statistics, so they came with the
tribal vs. non-tribal politics. So,
an oppressed in Bihar becomes an
oppressor in Jharkhand. With social
equity missing already, we have
compromised on the social harmony as
well.
About learning from Japanese
workers, first we need to study the
labour management and the social
culture of Japan. In Japan, there is
not so huge a difference between the
salaries paid to a CEO and a common
worker. When other parameters match
with Japan, probably we can talk of
similar kind of protests in India
too.
It’s unfortunate that the Gandhian
way of politics is out of fashion
these days. Hence, the Gandhian
principles are not considered
relevant in the current order. -
Kumod Jha - Sept. 1, 2006
Thanks T. V. Sinha and Ajay Kapoor
for your interesting insights. The
issue here in my view is about the
quest of an identity. Bihar as an
entity may be few years or few
centuries old. But what constitutes
Bihar is not just that but
encompasses all the layers of
civilization that that land has seen
over several millennia. That is very
deep and does not need any emphasis.
Somehow, in the current times we
have messed up our identity as a
state. This unfortunately has a bad
rub off on the reputation of all of
us, rightly or wrongly. A friend of
mine here in Chennai says why do
Biharis get upset when called as
Biharis. The fact is, we do not want
to be seen associating ourselves
with all that is Bihar now. This
must change. This probably will
change too, but will need conscious
efforts of all people. I am
delighted to see some wonderful
thoughts and debates that emerge on
PatnaDaily, and I guess we need more
of them. In my view, by our
fractured caste based thinking and
actions, we have killed any
possibility of cohesiveness in our
state, due to which things such as
creativity and new thought, for
which Bihar was once known for, has
become and unfortunate deadlock
victim. We need to think as Biharis,
and not as person from Bihar from so
and so caste etc. Till then we will
be uncomfortable with our identity,
and till then perhaps, the quest for
identity will not reach anywhere.
My humble thoughts. - Rajesh
Kumar, Chennai - Sept. 1, 2006
Thanks to the article, I was left
wondering about being a Bihari. What
does it mean to be Bihari ? What are
the attributes that define being a
Bihari ? Does it mean that if one is
born in the perimeters of Bihar,
he/she is a Bihari or is it
something else ? If two persons are
born, then are both of them a Bihari
youth in equal measures or is one of
them more Bihari than others for
some reasons. Does this definition
of Bihari and the pride of being a
Bihari is subject to change given
the current status of collective
image of Bihar ? Just some academic
questions but I would like to hear
the opinion of some of the fellow
readers here. - Ravindra Kumar -
Sept. 1, 2006
I'm delighted to read such wonderful
thoughts being presented here.
Thanks to all of you. This shows
that all is not lost for Bihar. We
may be down at the moment, but we
are not out yet, not yet!
I want to urge all us Biharis to be
proud about ourselves wherever we
are. I'm saying this because I often
meet people who say that they are
from Delhi, UP or some part of
India, only to reveal later on that
they are actually from Bihar, after
realising that I'm from Bihar too.
When it happens, it hurts me. How
can one be not proud of one's
native? Whether we like it or not,
we are part of that image that Bihar
has today. We cannot hide from it,
we cannot run away from it.
It is very easy to blame our
politicians (or administration) and
we can have strong (and may be
valid) reasons to do so. However, we
must realise that they are also a
part of us. They are also one of us.
We, as a society, have allowed such
people (or ideologies) to survive
and thrive. And somehow we need to
stop that. May be the educated
Biharis and the Biharis who are
living outside the state ( both in
India and abroad) should begin to
look towards Bihar and try to make
some difference in our
families/communities in whatever
small way we can, so that things
like 'casteism' and the huge
socio-economic divide in the society
gradually get eradicated.
Let us all do our bit to make Bihar
better! - Ravi Yadav (currently
in the UK) - Sept. 2, 2006
I too want to thank Mr Ajay Kapoor
for stirring discussion on this root
issue. I see this from an
existential point of view, and the
crisis seems to be coming from the
ignorance of "who am i?". Without
knowing self identity if someone
tells me that I am "blah blah", and
that "blah blah" is supposed to be
really "BAD" then I have no way to
prove him wrong, because I really
don't know who I am! I will be even
more shocked of being called "blah
blah" by others, because others seem
to be knowing more about me that
myself!! The bottom-line is that we
need to know our being, and once we
have even preliminary idea of who we
are then we can laugh when someone
accuses us of being a "blah blah".
Somehow people in other states are
less chided of being "blah blah",
and hence they don't need to know
their own address; they can
merrifully be ignorant of the most
important point, however, we cannot
afford that. I see this as positive
that we are forced to find our
address, which may not be "1 Anne
Marg", but may be far more
benevolent. - Ranjit Kumar -
Sept. 4, 2006
Having had the privilege to live in
several parts of the country and
outside of India, I don't think
caste is the main reason for the
backwardness of Bihar. Quite unlike
Kumodji, I belong to that tiny
minority whose native place was in
Jharkhand (Palamau), but was born
and brought up in Patna - till I.
Sc. that is. Subsequently, having
spent considerable time in several
other parts of India and abroad, I
would not say Biharis are anymore
caste oriented than others.
I am reminded of a TV program on
NDTV on the eve of the assembly
election of last Nov when a
correspondent was interviewing the
children of a Navodaya school and
kept on asking caste related
questions. After sometime, the
exasperated children felt so bad
that one of them ended asking the
interviewer if he was asking a
question or was trying to fit the
interview into a stereotype that he
already had. I could not resist a
chuckle.
My father tells me when he was
studying at Patna Science College in
the fifties, they had no
consciousness of their castes. Most
of his favourite teachers were not
only not from his caste, he became
conscious of their castes much much
later after he himself had been in a
job for several years. I did my I.
Sc. from B. N. College and this was
just after the reservation
introduced by Karpoori Thakur. Even
at the height of the bitterness, I
was not aware of the caste of the
people of my class, and nor were
others including the teachers.
This is not to say that caste is not
present in the consciousness of the
people. The caste killings and the
divide based on castes have to be
fought on a very firm footing. But
caste system in Bihar is not too
dissimilar to other states of the
Indian Union. Karnataka has the
Lingayat and the Vokkaligas, Kerala
the Nairs not to speak of the
various religious groups which act
like castes. To our east is West
Bengal where no prominent leader has
ever emerged outside the three
"forward" castes of Brahmin, Baidyas
and Bengali Kayasthas. Till date,
all the prominent leaders from
Orissa are either Brahmins or Karnas.
Haryana has been dominated by Jats
like no others. The most glaring
example is of Goa where you have,
believe it or not, Brahmin
Catholics. Even after some three
hundred years or more of their
conversion, they still marry within
the community!!! In fact, Brahmin
Christian phenomenon is not limited
to Goa only. They are in Bengal and
Tamil Nadu too. Michael Madhusudan
Dutt was a prominent Brahmin
Christian from Bengal. I have met at
least two from the group - a certain
Mr P Bonnerjee who traced his
ancestry to WC Bonnerjee of the
Indian National Congress fame and a
certain Anindya Nath Mukerjee. A
certain Mr Ayer who had Tamil
ancestry and was a prominent
advertising professional - I
presently forget the name of his
organisation of whose chairman he
was - was a Christian Brahmin from
TN. If you notice the spelling of
their surnames carefully, you can
discern the difference.
To give primacy to casteism as the
reason for every ill that plagues
Bihar is rather unfair. Let us not
forget, JP exhorted the youth from
the same Bihar to give up their
surnames which pronounced their
caste identity. It is one of those
historic ironies that one person who
took his advise was none other than
Dr Jagannath who gave up his surname
Mishra but who otherwise I would
imagine would have been a prominent
opposer to JP's movement.
Unfortunately, while caste has
become less pronounced in other
parts of the country because of the
opportunities that get opened up due
to development, in the case of
Bihar, this has not happened.
The ills of Bihar are by far
economic. Let us look at the total
investments made in Bihar, or rather
the lack of it, particularly since
independence. You would see a vast
gulf between Bihar and other states.
We are already aware of the ill
fated Freight Equalization Scheme
which broke the back of the industry
in Bihar even before it took off.
Let me give a few more : No temple
of modern learning as envisaged by
Nehru got a home in Bihar - I mean
IITs. IIMs, CSIR Lab or DRDO Lab. I
don't know how many are aware, there
was an actual rule which prevented
the setting up of a nuclear plant in
Bihar and Bengal, though not in UP
or Kerala. So it can't be that they
were trying to keep the plant away
from a densely populated area!! In
agriculture, the largest irrigation
system is the British built Son
Command Canal system. Readers may
like to read the analysis of the
economist Mohan Guruswamy of Centre
for Policy Alternatives, Delhi, to
have a fuller understanding of the
issues that I am raising.
This lack of investment has led to a
lack of development. Thus there are
limited opportunities in Bihar which
then leads to mass migration from
Bihar. We have hence acquired the
image of an indigent looser who can
be chastised by anybody. This is
today forcing the weak among us who
have become successful and live
outside Bihar to deny their Bihari
identity.
The situation of the Bihari today
has unfortunately got reduced to
that of a street dog whom everybody
wants to stone without rhyme or
reason. But then, as the legendary
storyteller Premchand says in one of
his short stories - Sadak ke kutte
ko aap jitna chahen dutkaar den,
phakar maar den. Magar ek baar woh
palat ke gurra de to dekhen aapki
himmat kahan jaati hai?
In the big bad world, some of us are
precisely trying to do that. - T.
V. Sinha - Sept. 4, 2006 |