|
British
Prime Minister recently announced a list of 500
concrete steps, large and small, to cut red tape
in the nation bureaucracy. The measures, which
range from simplifying forms to providing fire
safety certificates more easily is estimated to
save individuals, corporate and charities over
14 billion pounds (Rs 119,000 crore). And Blair
promised to come out with another 500
administrative ‘burdens’, which would save them
another 2 billion pounds.
Are India’s highly qualified and experienced
Prime Minister and the Finance Minister, or for
that matter the vice-chairman of Planning
Commission not aware of the timeworn, and
useless administrative procedures that must be
costing billions in cost of red tapes? How can
India attract the FDI that it is seeking so
aggressively, if as per an Assocham, nearly
62,000 proposals, involving a cumulative
investment flow of around Rs 1,550,000 crore,
are pending approvals from various states and
central government for the past 18years or so. “
It is observed that even at 40% fructification
of these investment proposals, investment of Rs
644,000 crore can come through, generating
employment for about 7.4 million people.” The
sectors involved include food processing,
textile and clothing, leather goods,
automobiles, auto components, minerals, steel,
cement, electronic products and components,
paper and paper products, chemical and allied
products and polymers and plastics. How can one
have confidence in the intention of the leaders
in the driving seats after going through these
reports? Why can’t a proposal that is
unacceptable, be dropped?
Why should they waste so much of energy and
resources of their own and the country, if they
can’t improve the basic requirements for getting
the foreign investment? Can the investment
climate be called congenial if it takes 89 days
to start a business, 67 days to register a
property, 425 days to enforce a contract and
seven days to a month to clear goods from
customs, and almost 155 of management time is
wasted to deal with officials? Is it something
that the Prime Minister can’t get corrected? Why
can’t he confess this?
Though the British Empire where the sun never
used to set is dead, but the nation and its
leaders are conscious of the competition from
the emerging economies specially ‘Chindia’ to
give a sharp competitive edge to British
business in global trade. Chancellor Gordon
Brown, the next prospective tenant of 10 Downing
Street has been talking of the threat, “ Once
responsible for just one-eighth of the world’s
growth, China and India will soon capture almost
half. They are competing not just on low cost,
but on high skill.” And that is reason for the
steps to cut the prevailing red tapes. The
nation is preparing to face the challenge. For
information, in the same process of
restructuring the administration, UK is having
an ambitious target to cut unnecessary
bureaucracy by 25% by 2010. At least it appears
the national leaders of UK are following the
strategies necessary to correct the situation,
if it is bad and correctible.
Why can’t similar steps be taken in India? Why
can’t India take a cue from the story from
Britain that has given India the present
bureaucracy as legacy and act?
|
Comments: |
|
No comment so far. |
|
Discussion on this topic is now
closed. |
Return to previous Page |