Home |Contact Us | Site Map

 

Readers Write Index

 


Victory at Last!

by Seema Jyotishi

Dec. 19, 2006

Readers Write

 

The news of conviction of Manu Sharma and Vikas Yadav are a sign of victory for the truth at last. It also proves that if organizations start taking their role seriously then leaders and so called big influential people will definitely be scared. The landmark judgments of finding Manu Sharma and Vikas Yadav guilty of killing Jessica Lal and Nitish Katara would not have been possible if NDTV and other organizations had not pressed the matter for justice.

When it comes to murder, all criminals are guilty of taking the life of a human being. Manu Sharma killed Jessica Lal in front of a big crowd. Still he was set free because of lack of evidences… what an irony for the country. Similar story was repeated when the murder of Nitish Katara came into light. It went to the extent that the prime eyewitness Miss Bharti was packed off to London so that no one can be caught. It took a real super effort by our officials to bring her back.

It is really sad to see that in our country the rules and regulations are adjusted and tampered according to the conveniences of the criminals because sometimes they belong to big influential group. The Home Minister of Bihar government is asking for death penalty for the murderers of Dr Ghosh. Isn’t it true that all those criminals are young and don’t belong to any big family. Had it been so, then would our Honorable minister given the same comment?

 

Comments:
It's a rarely seen reversal of judgment. I don't know if justice has been done to the family of Jessica Lal and that of Manu Sharma but this must raise many questions on the rationality and credibility of our judiciary system. I am writing so because it is complete toppling of judgment by the same system. Why did it happen? Whose judgment should be taken as right judgment? If the current judgment is true and faithful what about the dignity and justification of the service of previous judgment giver?

The current judgment has been given after intense hue and cry made by media and public that fetched attention of the judiciary and ultimately led to find fully guilty all those who were totally fair. How could this happen? What would have happened if the public and media had not rang the alarm? Is our judiciary becoming subjective?
Rajkishore Prasad - Dec. 20, 2006

It’s ok that Jessica Lal got justice but will High Courts of India take self notice of every miscarriage of justice in the lower trial court the way it has taken suo motu cognizance of the media reports in this case? I am afraid media is very biased. Isn’t it a fact that media ignored the news about rape and brutal murder of Khailangi’s Priyanka Bhotmange? This crime was also committed before whole public. It is good that judiciary has rectified something which it did wrong in first place in case of Jessica but who will rectify the media which still does not see beyond few miles of its office in metro cities? Who will bring the news about the injustice to the notice of High Courts from remote places where not affluent like Jessica but poor girl like Priyanka are raped and butchered publicly? - Shiv Shankar Sharma - Dec. 21, 2006


It does not seem to be fair to say that since the murderers of Ms Ghosh are young, they should be absolved of the crime they perpetrated. We should certianly go and try to find out the reasons as to why killing is the only way to make money for some people.

Nonetheless, if the way the murder was committed was brutal, justice would have to match it in intensity. We cannot turn saint while doling out justice. Let them be hanged if they deserve to be hanged. - Kishore Das - Dec. 22, 2006

Discussion on this topic is now closed.

Return to previous Page

 

 

All rights reserved, 2000-2006, PatnaDaily.Com.