Dear Bharati ,
I strongly oppose your use of
sentences where you have mentioned
the name of a few castes. How can
you? And on what basis?
Interesting, you have artificially
coined a new word "Bhuku". (Bhumihar
and Kurmi)
1. Prakash Jha is going to be
benefited by Nitish' new policies on
development, is he a BHUKU?
2. Sri Nand Kishore Singh ex-IAS is
now a policy-maker and
decision-maker of Bihar. Is he a
BHUKU?
3. R. K. Singh, IAS is the secretary
of most powerful and money-involved
department, Road Construction. Is he
a BHUKU?
4. M. M. Jha is planning a new,
educated Bihar. Is he BHUKU?
5. Anil Sinha, IPS, IG (HQ) is most
visible at 1, Anne Marg. Is he a
BHUKU?
6. How many new medical colleges and
new engineering colleges to BHUKU? I
guess none.
7. Do you mean if Radha Krishnan Jha
was the GURU of LALU, then complete
JHA community were in favour of
Lalu?? If yes, then you are wrong.
8. What's wrong, If Nitish installed
his own friend Lallan Singh as JD-U
chief in BIHAR? They have friendship
since 1974 and he is the Hanuman for
Nitish who designed all political
games of 2000 and 2005. Its total
personal relationship. In Nitish
raj, only two Kurmis are on top
post: one is Nitish himself and
another is the DGP. For your kind
information, the present DGP was
famous for his close relations with
Lalu and his retirement is due. Only
two Bhumihars are on top, P. K.
Shahi amd Lalan Singh. Again P. K.
Shahi because he was much involved
in fodder scam from Nitish side. His
Hard work was due.
If you are talking about 4
ministers, then Ramashray Babu was
the choice of Nitish himself
although Ramashray Babu lost the
election. Health Minister from the
quota of BJP, Ajit Kumar is a
qualified engineer who, along with
Anil Kumar, jumped from LJP to JD-U,
so their accommodation was required.
In Fact , Nitish is taking all good
people from every section. Please
don't have such feelings on
PatnaDaily. - Ranjan Rituraj Sinh
- July 29, 2006
It appears to me that the author has
failed to provide correct answer
particularly about the cast
combination. It also appears that he
has limited knowledge about the
bureaucracy and political system. I
do not see common man of Bhumihar
and Kurmi have benefited from
presented Govt. Two key persons of
Bhumihar are close to CM due to
other reason. Advocate General is
close due to old association with
the CM. This has nothing to do with
his caste. ADG is honest and and
capable officer. His honesty is not
hidden to anybody in Bihar and
Nation as a whole. He has suffered
in the earlier Govt. If CM is
promoting honesty, then it should
not be linked with caste.
This type nasty propaganda is being
raised every time when particular
caste gets opportunity by virtue of
merit. - Ashok
- July 29, 2006
Looking to the messages posted by
Mr. Ranjan and Mr Mukesh it seems
that Mr Bharti has written this
article based on some ill motives. -
Dr R. S. Rai, Faculty, Statistics &
O.R., Amity Business School, Jaipur
- July 31, 2006
It is unfortunate that you have used
the word BHUKU. Either you don't kow
the fact or you don't want to know
the fact. There is no doubt
Bhumihars and Kurmis did hard work
for the installation of the
government what about Nand Kishore
Yadav, Sharad Yadav..? They have
been given due credentials in the
government and the party. Seems you
are hurt only because Nitish Kumar
is in power. - Ram N Kumar - Aug.
1, 2006 |
