|
As
soon as you read the title of this article, your
brain analyzed the idea and even as you are
reading these words you are set either for or
opposed to the idea.
Many a times, when we are presented with an
idea, our brain does a quick-calc and arrives at
a position. In doing the quick-calc, the brain
uses all the relevant preconceived notions and
biases that already exist in our mind.
If you find yourself staunchly opposed to the
idea of including Farsi as a foreign language
course in our schools, it could probably be
because subconsciously you see it as the
language of the invaders who crossed the
Hindukush mountains and brought misery to India
in the years leading up to the British rule.
Here are some facts to consider:
Fact 1. Farsi has existed since the dim early
periods of history. In fact, Farsi and Sanskrit
are the children of the same mother language
(Proto Indo-European Language) that were born on
either side of the Hindukush.
Fact 2. Farsi is closer to Sanskrit and many
other North Indian dialects than even Hindi is!
The grammar, syntax and vocabulary of Farsi are
very similar to our Hindustani tongue and
neither we, nor the Persians, realize that this
commonality exists.
Fact 3. Farsi is spoken in many countries of
Central Asia. Its purest 'dari' version is the
official language of Afghanistan.
Fact 4. Turkish (a cousin of Farsi) is written
in Roman script like English. Farsi too can be
adopted to the Devnagri script if a semitic
script system (Arabic) is considered to be a
hindrance in its acceptance.
Fact 5. Islam came from the Arabs and Hinduism
came from the original Arya people getting
heavily influenced by local tribal legends of
the Indian subcontinent. Farsi existed before
either of the two religions existed. It is a
common heritage of Hindus and Muslims. It is a
point of convergence. It reminds us that we are
one people. Along with Sanskrit, Farsi is the
sangam where both Hindus and Muslims can wash
off their differences and celebrate the cultural
oneness. Religion needs to be downplayed and
culture needs to be emphasized. Some local
influences aside, the North Indian Hindus and
Muslims are culturally and ethnically the same
stock as the Afghans, Persians and other people
of central Asia.
Religion and politics has put barriers between
our people to such an extent that we have
forgotten that the folks two rows of fences away
from us, talk like us, celebrate like us, sing
like us and are our cousins who got coralled of
when these fences got built.
Thanks to Jinnah, you don't see the Kabuliwalla
on the streets of India anymore. Our generation
does not know that these lovable simple and
fiercely loyal people used to travel the length
and breadth of India carrying wares from afar
and having trouble with the genderized grammar
of Hindi - before Mr. Jinnah asked for a fence
to keep his flock from mixing with the Indians.
Just as we wrap up Holi on the East side of
Pakistan and Noruz on its West side, it is time
to realize that we are all one people
celebrating the arrival of spring as we have
done for centuries before we became Hindus or
Muslims. On the last full moon night, bonfires
were lit up in India for Holika dahan. Bonfires
were lit up on the same day in Persia (Iran) to
celebrate Chahar-shamba-suri (the suri
festival). Both told legends of a untruthful
lady being burnt in the fire. Both legends -
remarably similar! In India we consider fish to
be something auspicious to see on the day of our
New Year (Holi). Last Monday, thousands of
people in Iran bought life colourful fish as a
auspicious token as well!
We should celebrate our culture. It is what
joins us as one people. Unlike Jinnah, we should
not harp on religion too much - for that's what
divides us. If there is one lot that holds the
short end of the stick by building a fence, it
is the Jinnahites - who, despite grabbing the
most fertile Indus basin, still live as a pale
miserable nation, ailed by the fundamentalism
that created them.
|
Comments: |
Promoting friendship, respect
cultural diversity and harmony among
different faith of society, which
seems to be the theme of the article
is reflection of a noble intention
of the writer but it shouldn't be
done at the cost of Historical
distortion and culture invasion. I
don't agree with writer on these two
points:
i) Hinduism came from the original
Arya people getting heavily
influenced by local tribal legends
of the Indian subcontinent.
ii) Farsi has existed since the dim
early periods of history. In fact,
Farsi and Sanskrit are the children
of the same mother language (Proto
Indo-European Language) that were
born on either side of the Hindukush.
Hindusim word has not been found in
any of the holy Indian scriptures
like Veda and Bhagvad Gita. Invaders
who crossed the river Sindu couldn't
pronounce the word "Sindu" properly
and started calling inhabitants of
Sindu river valley "HINDU". This is
how "HINDU" word has come into
existence. Point is HINDU'S are
follower of SANATAN DHARMA. SANATAN
means eternal and SANATAN DHARM is
religion of eternity. A religion
which transcends the boundary of
time and space. I assume, HINDU and
SANATAN DHARM are interchangeable.
"HINDUISM has not come from original
Arya people BUT IT HAS BEEN GIFTED
TO HUMAN BEING BY CREATOR OF THIS
COSMIC MANIFESTATION LORD SRI KRSNA"
Of course this we don't find in our
documented ancient history of India
which need to be rewritten. "RAMAYAN"
AND "MAHABHARAT" should be part of
that history
I may sound bit fanatic but this is
fact which every Indian should
acknowledge and feel proud of being
part of the eternal culture, whether
he is "HINDU", "MUSLIM", OR
"CHRISTIAN" or follower of any other
sect.
History of India and World have been
written by people who wanted to
prove the Biblical description of
beginning of human civilization is
correct and authentic.
Coming to another point, Sanskrit is
known as "DEVANAGARI". "DEVANAGARI"
means "CITY OF GOD". A language
which is used in the city of GOD.
Sanskrit is only flawless language
available in today's world. Other
languages have emerged from SANSKRIT
not the other way round. SANSKRIT is
mother of so MANY other language but
SANSKRIT is not the child of any
language. - Niraj Singh - Mar.
27, 2006 |
|
Discussion on this topic is now
closed. |
Return to previous Page |