|
I
seriously don't understand the quality and
relevance of news items these days. Reporters,
it seems, have nothing better to do than to
report all these nonsensical items in news
papers. Even the editors feels them worthy to be
reported and allow it to be published. One
example I just case across is about Rakhi Sawant
being diehard fan of Lalu Prasad Yadav!
Full news items from Bihartimes.com:
(Item girl Rakhi Sawant is diehard fan of
Railway Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav and said she
loves his lifestyle, rustic Hindi and body
language.
"Laluji is my favourite leader, I love him, he
is the best leader I know," Rakhi Sawant told
media persons in Patna before her dance show
Sunday.
"I know Bihar as Lalu Bihar, for me Bihar means
Laluji," she added.
Nitish Kumar's supporters were hugely
disappointed when she said: "I know little about
Bihar's new Chief Minister Nitish Kumar."
It was not first time an actor has praised Lalu.
He has huge fan following in Bollywood - Manisha
Koirala, Shilpa Shetty, Pooja Bhath, Nagma,
Bhagyashree, Pakistani actress Meera, Suniel
Shetty, Govinda, Chunkey Pandey, director Mahesh
Bhatt and Sanjay Manjrekar to name a few.)
Not sure, if anybody is at all interested in
either of them. So what if Rakhi Sawant is a
diehard fan of Lalu and so what if a bunch of
Bollywood actresses are fan of Lalu? Who really
gives a damn?
If that is true then why don't we see these
actresses and actors changing anything in their
lifestyle? I can understand some of these people
(Mahesh Bhatt) when they say they like Lalu
because of his directness, which I believe, is
good and I admire him for that too.
But regardless, who really is interested in
these news items? I am not sure if there is any
relevance of these items to our society,
science, politics, drama.... So, why am I
wasting my time writing this article?
We Biharis are insulted when somebody says that
"I know Bihar as Lalu Bihar, for me Bihar means
Laluji," and that is the reason I am writing
this article. We don't take pride in anything
that has to do with Lalu. It is shame that
people know Bihar because of Lalu and not
because of our real heroes. Somebody had listed
real heroes of Bihar in some previous article.
Bihar should be known because of Gautam Buddha,
Jain, Arya Bhatt, Rajendra Prasad, Ramdhari
Singh Dinkar, for good places like Bodh Gaya,
Pawapuri, Patna Sahib, Rajgir, Hazaribagh,
Sasaram, Madhubani for paintings etc.... The
list goes on and on yet the reporters find items
about Lalu and Rakhi Sawant to write article
on!!!
Why can't these reporters write something about
these things that are genuinely good and people
are interested? Has relevance to the society,
our children and even adults will learn about
our heroes. We can attract tourists to Bihar by
talking about great places of Bihar.
Bihar is rich in many different ways:
- Historically - among one of the oldest
- Politically - Chanakya, even till Bihar was
divided, it used to be one of the biggest
contributor in India's politics / democracy
- Geographically - wild life, minerals, rivers
etc..
- Religion wise - more then one religion started
from Bihar; They still are one of the religion
that people in the world follow.
- Arts & Craft - Madhubani paintings
- Literature - there were many good authors and
poets from Bihar
- Mathematics - Arya Bhatt
the list goes on and on.
The point is, if you don't have anything worthy
to report from current events, why don't you
spend time and learn and report something worthy
from past?
Just beats me.
|
Comments: |
I understand your pain...Roshan.
At the same time, I do not feel
insulted. Bihar had/has lots of
Laloo, Paswan or their type since
1970s and later got percolated in
all section and profession. You just
name any leader.... I will give you
detail....irrespective of whiteness
of their white-clothes... it was/is
highly blotted. Go to the
PatnaDaily.Com website and photos by
Shashi Uttam. You will see all "Dheela-dhukur".
We are so rigid (Lalooism) to change
ourselves and look smart, and make
smart Bihar. "Dheela-dhukur" Chinese
and Japanese now look so very smart,
so does Japan and China.
In other words, from 1970 to 1990,
Lalooism was divided in several
parts, and fortunately each part did
not have enough threshold to
identify themselves alone (I mean
with Bihar). Laloo had/has charisma,
so he crossed threshold, then
derived strength from us, whatever
the means is, and ruled Bihar and
gave a new name to Bihar. Did anyone
ever think that why Bihar produced "Laloo
like leader", and is still continues
to produce? Why highly educated
people have systematically been
sidelined from the politics? Why or
when did we stop producing leader
like Dr. Rajendra Prasad?
We need to ask these from our
ancestors who simply watched the
demolition of Bihar before or after
JP movement. Since early 1980s,
Biharis started sending their
children outside Bihar for better
education without protesting or
demanding for better educational
institution within the boundary of
Bihar. It is unfortunate that those
Biharis who do not have
political/police connection in
Bihar, never felt safe and hardly
try to visit Bihar; who is
responsible for such pity situation
--- the growing Lalooism of early
1980s. This is one of the major
reason, why Bihar produced so many
administrative staffs across India (UPSC,
BPSC, MPSC, UPPSC, RPSC, etc), to
just derive power and provide
security to their loved ones.
What else shall I write about Bihar?
Our fault lies in our society, which
guides us more than one way. Just
check the background of entire
participants of our political or
social system, 100% have no vision.
In my hometown we have roads where
only two rickshaw can pass at one
time, and so in Patna at many
places. Just imagine, the great
intellectual planners of Bihar of
early 70s who never thought that one
day all Biharis will be riding in
cars. This is because of arrogant
Lalooism of our mind. Recent
example, Ritesh Mohan, an NRI who
fought with Jet Airways staff after
being denial to board the plane even
after reporting late at Patna
Airport reveals the Lalooism of our
present mind. Can he repeat the same
at any airport in USA? The answer is
a BIG NO. In brief, we need to
defeat Lalooism within us for the
betterment of Bihar. Hundreds or
thousands or better to say millions
(all of us) of power mongers are
practicing Lalooism everyday in
Bihar. Those who think, "that we are
different" are venting anger at
PatnaDaily.Com.
There is no point pressing all the
time that we were great
(Chanakya-ism), what we are today is
the matter of concern for the rest
of India (Laloo-ism).
Historically we are one of the
oldest, agree. Presently we are the
laughing stock.
India's democracy is nowhere related
to Chanakya's policy. It is not also
in India's education curricula.
At present it is wild to live with
fear and anger, if you do not know
any bhaiya and chacha from political
power staion. "Mukhiya aur sarpanch
bhi chalega". (Even in Nitish
Kumar's regime). Shri Nitish Kumar
can talk of development, but
development can only be done if
society as a whole understands the
meaning of development. That can
only be possible if we defeat
Lalooism from within.
Aryabhatta came from Kerala to study
at Nalanda in 476 AD.
Again, in one line, our problem lies
in our complex society. Although we
claim to be simple, but basically we
never think straight. We try to
derive meaning and milage of our
every act. "Mr. ABCD... sansand ke
kote se bari path ka
punarnirmankarya shuru..." Name,
fame is so very important for us,
that is why we always try to outdo
individual effort.
We need to do introspection, without
blaming other, even this reporter
who quote Rakhi Sawant. Because it
is our fault that we made our
society like this where majority
needs to eat and read masala. We
need to come out from our constant
state of self-denial. - Sudhir
Ranjan - Nov. 2, 2006
Well said Mr. Roshan Kumar. Today's
media publishes news that are not
newsworthy at all. "3-year old
charged with theft/ molesting".
These kinds of news are a complete
waste of time because you know the
news will be changed tomorrow.
"Police made a mistake in charging
the 3-year old boy yada yada yada...".
Rakhi Sawant (whoever the heck she
may be) is in love with Lalu Yadav.
So who gives a hoot? I am sure she
has been in love with many other men
(married/unmarried) before so why it
is so important that the entire
world should know about it?
I have noticed that IAN and CNN-IBN
are the leaders in propagating
absurd news like this and then web
sites like Bihartimes.Com are just
too eager to put them on their web
site without first considering the
'newsworthiness' of the articles in
question!
I am also up to my ears with
NDTV.com news items. Just about all
the news end up with a personal
note. "...and Bihar, that is known
as the badland of India, will
continue to suffer through these
problems unless..." Well, who asked
for your opinion? Just stick to
facts - date, time, characters
involved, actions taken etc... don't
editorialize every news item for
god's sake!! - Anil Kumar - Nov.
3, 2006
Just as I
predicted, the little boy who was
charged with robbing a bus, has been
set free as the police withdrew the
case "under intense media pressure".
Here is the
link to the story . -
Anil Kumar - Nov. 4, 2006
Just wanted to clarify one thing
based on Sudhir Ranjan's comment -
there is no historical fact that
Aryabhatta came from Kerala. He was
from Kusumapur (which was the name
of Patna). Some Keralites or others
are generally 'quoting' that he was
from Kerala and propagating it.
Let's not agree to that without
facts. Just like that we are not so
good in mathematics. We have an old
base of Mathematics in Bihar. -
Naveen Kumar Sharma
- Nov. 6, 2006
Absolutely correct Naveen - we have
to question such 'facts' which are
thrown around without adequate
research. In the context of today's
coverage about Bihar in the National
media which has mostly negative
news, we have to be specially
skeptical about such facts. I see a
pattern to be to deny every positive
attribute associated to Bihar.
I would go to the extent of saying
that since a whole class of
'journalists' have anchored their
being to a belief that Bihar is a
living hell, such people get pushed
out of their comfort zone by any
coverage of a positive nature about
Bihar and feel a sense of acute
insecurity. They then attack Bihar
with double intensity. We are in
exactly that phase where such a
feeling is at its shrillest worst
and we have to take extra care at
this juncture when things are
beginning to turn positive.
Here are a few posers inspired by
the book Freakonomics:
1. Does Bihar have the highest crime
rate in India?
2. Is a Bihari more casteist than
people from the other states of
India?
3. Is Bihar more corrupt than the
rest of the country?
4. Does investment by the government
achieve less in Bihar than the rest
of the country? Or is the investment
itself less?
5. Is corruption the real reason for
the backwardness of Bihar?
I am not saying whether any of these
are false. Only unbiased academic
scholarship can answer these
questions. I am merely saying that
we need to question such paradigms
which are bandied about like facts
without questioning.
Professors of economics at Patna
University or other universities in
Bihar could consider taking up such
studies which mean something in our
day to day life. Any takers? -
Thakur Vikas Sinha, Powai, Mumbai -
Nov. 6, 2006
Here is another example of media
bias against Bihar/UP by NDTV.
Someone needs to tell them to shut
up.
"Noida,
where several multinational firms
have set up outsourcing centres
drawn by a vast pool of cheap,
English-speaking labour and a
booming software industry, is in
Uttar Pradesh, one of the most
populous and lawless state.
This is first incident of kidnapping
involving a high profile software
company in recent times. But
kidnapping for ransom is common in
Bihar and other parts of Uttar
Pradesh."
What was the point of adding these
two paragraphs in the news item
except to malign Bihar and UP?
Wouldn't the story be still complete
without such shameless
editorialization of a crime news? -
Anil Kumar - Nov. 14, 2006 |
|
Discussion on this topic is now
closed. |
Return to previous Page |