Home |Contact Us | Site Map

 

Readers Write Index

 


Why Two International Airports in Bihar?

by Naveen Kumar Sharma
Associated with Tourism Projects in Bihar

Oct. 16, 2006

Readers Write

 

As part of the research on tourism improvement of Bihar, I found out that there are two airports operational in Bihar. Patna and Gaya and both have international status. The distance between the two airports is less than 100 kilometer. The number of flights operating in Patna airport is less 100 per week and in Gaya less than 50 per week. Number of flights that Bangalore or Hyderabad handles per week is more than 1000.

In order to run an airport we need a lot of running expenditure.

1. Round the clock power and water supply.
2. Round the clock - communication system to be up and ATC in place.
3. Round the clock security and emergency staff.
4. Customs and immigrations setup and associated organisation.
5. Round the clock fuel supply
6. Complete airport infrastructure
7. Airport Ground Staff, Airlines Ground Staff, Lodging and food facilities for transiting passengers and flying staff.
8. Many more...

With the above running cost - why on earth we are trying to run two airports in Bihar which are so near to each other? Why can't we make a 4-6 lane super higway between Patna and Gaya (they anyway fall in the Tourism Golden Triangle of Bihar) and passengers can reach in about 1 hour journey? This way we can reduce our operational cost significantly and utilise the resources elsewhere. Experts can decide on which of the two airport that makes more sense. I have preference over Patna as this is the state capital but will go by experts decision on this.

After 10 years when we become a developed state and the chosen airport is not able to handle the capacity then we can open the second airport.

One of the things I found out was San Jose Airport in California is making losses and is unviable as most of the traffic is handled by the San Franscisco airport. The two airports are around 150 kilometer. There is discussion to close San Jose Airport.

I would like the Civil Aviation Minister of Bihar to take cognisance of the above facts and if agree then take necessary actions in this regard.

 

Comments:
Have you taken a good look at the roads of Bihar?

Gaya attracts the maximum international tourists in Bihar and i can assure you that if these people had to face the road journey from Patna to Gaya , then their number will go down drastically! - Anumeha Singh - Oct. 16, 2006

What is an international Airport ? Any airport that has a flight to/from an international destination is called an "International Airport". Flights from Patna and Gaya going to Kathmandu, make both of these airports "international".

In addition to the facilities at any regular airport, you have staff and security to process immigration needs of the passengers traveling at an "International Airport". In absence of data regarding revenue generation of both Patna and Gaya airports, a decision can not be made on their viability. Airports earn their sustenance through the Airport taxes levied on passengers and aircraft, fees levied on Airlines to use the terminals and facilities at the airport and from fees on cargo shipments out of the airport. A projected assessment of these incomes will have to be made over the next fifty years to get a realistic assessment of the financial performance of both of these airports.

San Jose Int'l airport is still functioning. It handles many flights to Silicon Valley a day. If it has financial woes, it clearly does not show in the functioning of the Airport. If you have to go to Menlow Park, Cupertino, Sunnyvale, Milpitas, Fremont and many other cities in that South Bay Area, then San Jose Int'l airport is the answer. This airport also eases traffic and congestion of the air and road traffic in San Francisco.

There can be political agendas in restricting Patna as the only 'Port of Entry' so that the foreigners coming into the state will 'have to' pass through the Capital and will spend some money there. If indeed Patna and Gaya are connected by a high speed rail, the problem of a second large International airport at Gaya might be solved, but then, there will have to be facilities in Patna to handle the transiting International Passengers to /from Gaya - and also, the crime / security level of Patna will have to be factored into the equation.

I am inclined to agree with the author that there should be one port of entry at Patna, but from that point on, rapid transit should be available to Gaya so that a tourist does not feel obligated to stick around in Patna if he/she does not want to.

In addition, If I were doing what Nitish Kumar is doing, I'd explore the possibility of running weekly air charters out of Patna that would take foreign tourists to, Rajgir, Nalanda, Kushi Nagar (UP) and Lumbini (Nepal) and bring them back to Patna by the end of the day. It may require a partnership with Govt. of Nepal, Govt. of UP and Govt. of Japan to pull it off, but it is surely worth the effort. - Aarcee - Oct. 16, 2006


One of the points which I did not highlight well was - Airports work on 'Hub' concept. Unless there is enough traffic to an airport - additional flights will not get added. So we need to create a 'Hub'. Either Patna or Gaya. If you create a 'Hub' then people get easy connections, operational efficiency increases and with a reduction of cost.

Secondly, in case of San Jose and San Francisco - SFO airport has reached its critical mass in terms of operations, hence San Jose airport can still be justified which is not the case of Patna or Gaya Airport. Both are getting very very sub optimal number of flights. It's like having two Bus Depot in a town with fewer number of buses starting and ending in both of them to outside towns/cities. It becomes a pain for passengers as they loose the backup options.

Thirdly - I agree all this creation of 'Hub' only makes sense if we have world class roads. And it means covering the entire Tourist golden triangle - Patna-Rajgir-Gaya.
One more example - Jerusalem attracts 10 million tourists (mostly religious/heritage based - same as Bihar) but the airport which runs is Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv which is 120 km from Jerusalem. - Naveen Kumar Sharma - Oct. 17, 2006


In response to the letter of Mr. Naveen Kumar Sharma, I shall like to point out that what is needed is the development of the region, the hinterland of these two airports. Only with very fast development, the capacity can be better utilized. As a suggestion, the whole region is very fertile. As I remember of a brief stay at Noorsarai in 1966, the area produces potato, chilly, and tobacco. A special agency of the government must work on encouraging the production of right varieties that can be exported. If West Bengal can export potato, why can’t Bihar? One of the Agricultural institutes of Bihar must dedicate its resources and technical know-how to help the people. Further, the reputed entrepreneurs must be brought with all sorts of incentive to open food-processing units.

But the most importantly, Bihar must exploit its potential of tourism at the best. Tourism must be undertaken as the prime savior of the corridor running from Vaishali to Buddha Gaya. Bihar must develop this area to make it attractive for the people of South-east Asia. - Indra - Oct. 17, 2006

Discussion on this topic is now closed.

Return to previous Page

 

 

All rights reserved, 2000-2006, PatnaDaily.Com.