|
I
was just going through
this news. I went on to further delve
in this matter of demand and supply of cereal
grains in India. India had produced a record
76.37 million tons of wheat in 2000, but since
then the wheat production has declined. This
forced India to import 5 million tons from
Australia in 2006. The year 2007 didn't present
a different story as tender for procuring 0.5
million tons has already been in place few
months back. The government has further issued
tender to buy around 4 million tons of wheat
from other countries to maintain the buffer of
15 million tons. With a decline in wheat
production on a worldwide basis, the government
will need to buy wheat at a rate of around Rs.
1200/quintal. The reserve 11 million which the
government has procured from farmers was bought
at a minimum support price (MSP) of Rs.
750/quintal. Is it fare to our farmers who put
their sweat and blood to produce as much as they
can? I think it would have made more sense if
government might have predicted the price in
international market and fixed the MSP a bit
higher. I guess that would have surely made
India sit with sufficient buffer of wheat. The
MSP of wheat has not changed much over the past
few years which along with the average increase
of temperature during filling seasons, and
reduced use of fertilizer is responsible for the
decline in wheat production.
The other matter on this topic involves the
stringent quality norms of Indian government for
importing wheat. One will be surprised to know
that the wheat produced in USA doesn't pass the
quality norms of the Indian government. As
against a limit of 100 weeds in a shipment of
200 kg, wheat which USA imports has 12,000
weeds, which is way too high. Wheat from USA
also has 21 weeds alien to India. Therefore, its
good that the wheat is not important from USA.
But, whats surprising is that fact that 5
million tons of wheat imported from Australia
had 11 weeds which is alien to India. Should one
expect this double standard policy of Indian
government?
Wheat is just an example. The same story might
happen with rice or maize. From the FAO website,
I found out the yields of wheat, rice, and maize
to be 1048, 1214, and 854 kg/acres respectively.
Just to quench curious me, Highest yields of
wheat, rice, and maize worldwide are 3692
(Netherland), 4133 (Australia), and 9311
(Jordan) kg/acres respectively. Rather than
issuing the tenders for the deficit crops,
shouldn't the government give consulting to the
highest yielding countries so that we have
enough supply of cereal grains to feed our
people? Some of the practices can be adopted
without even getting the know how of countries
like Netherlands and Australia. After learning
all this, I am not sure how much of a success
are initiatives like e-chaupal are.
Some of the practices which can be adopted
include laser assisted land leveling which has
been found to increase the yield of the crop,
reduce irrigation requirement, and reduce
fertilizer requirement. Efforts should be made
for the adoption of conservation agriculture by
our farmers. Three main principles of
conservation agriculture include minimum soil
disturbance (no till farming), permanent residue
soil cover, and crop rotation. These efforts
along with Integrated Pest Management (IPM) can
only prevent us from the shame of importing
cereal grains from country like USA which has
less than 1% of their population involved in
farming.
|
Comments: |
|
No
comment so far. |
|
Discussion on this topic is now
closed. |
Return to previous Page |