|
In
Rajasthan, people still practice purdah. The
practice came into existence during Mughal rule,
when we had to protect our women from men. After
that the Mughal rule came to an end, we got
Independence but we still continue to practice
purdah. We must change with the times.”
The above is from a speech of Pratibha Patil,
Governor, Rajasthan and the UPA candidate for
the forthcoming Presidential race and the
virtual president-designate in Udaipur at a
function to commemorate the 467th birth
anniversary of Maharana Pratap. Her reference
was just to urge for abolition of the practice.
However, her opinion that the purdah was
introduced in India to "save women from Mughal
invaders", has created a furor among the Muslim
leaders, historians and politicians of
opposition parties, who wants to cash on this.
Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind general secretary Maulana
Mehmood Madani said, ‘She has twisted history,
she must apologise and withdraw her
observations.' It has certainly created a
problem for Mrs. Patil.
I don’t know why we Indians have become so much
intolerant. It is something strange for our
culture of thousands of years. Why should the
people take an opinion so seriously? I
personally feel the purdah certainly was to
conceal the faces of women from strangers,
particularly the strong, brute, uncultured ones.
Someone who would have seen Padmini, the queen
of Rana Pratap ancestry, narrated about her
beauty to Alauddin Khilji who invaded the
kingdom to get her as her wife. But it was only
Mughals, it was also true with the Hindu kings
and even petty feudal.
Historians say ‘purdah’ originated in India much
before Babur heralded the Mughal rule in 1526
AD. Some of them say purdah was a status symbol
of the higher classes in medieval India.
According to renowned historian Satish Chandra,
during the Delhi Sultanate period, beginning in
1206, the practice of keeping women in seclusion
and asking them to veil their faces in the
presence of outsiders became widespread among
the upper class women. It was the Arabs and the
Turks brought the custom to India, and
consequently, it became widespread in north
India. Historian Kegan Paul traces the practice
of the custom back to the Vedic period. And
anthropologist Patricia Jeffrey also opines its
origin before the Muslim invasion. The mediaeval
Chittorgarh fort that has separate quarters for
women called the ‘jenani deorhi’. Even in our
village, we also had a system of ‘janani kitta’
that used to be meant for women. Women will have
purdah with all the elders in the family. Yamuna
used to have purdah till very late, whenever she
used to visit our village. It was absolutely
necessary when we used to visit our mother at
Bodarhi, my maternal village. It was to convey
the message among the neighbours, particularly
the women folks that the daughter- in-law is
very obedient and abides the traditional things
even though she is a wife of an officer.
Interestingly, the peasant and working class
women did not observe purdah. It was a feature
primarily among upper classes. However, very
lately they also copied what the women of the
farming community did.
However, ‘‘most historians consider the Muslim
invasion as a watershed when purdah is said to
have become more widespread as a defensive
reaction in troubled times among the Rajput
royalty trying to protect their women.”
But I feel like narrating some troubles caused
by purdah system. Every summer in marriage
season in Bihar in good old days we used to read
a number of stories how the brides returning
with their husbands from the marriage used to
get mixed while boarding trains. My grand father
has also mentioned about it in his diary. It is
certainly something that must stop. The respect
can be shown in other ways too.
But I believe, the best against purdah has come
from Tulsidas in his Ramcharitmanas. Sita is
being brought from Lanka’s captivity after Ram
wins the war in ‘palki’ or ‘sivika’. And then
Ram instructs, “Kah Raghuvir kahaa mum manahoo,
sitahi sakha payade aanahoo, dekhahhoon kapi
janani ki nai.” (Let Sita come on her feet, so
that all the monkeys can see her as mother.)
A poet talks about the prevailing traditions of
the society through his characters. Purdah was
not a part of Indian cluttered. I have hardly
seen any female statute with veil o the face.
|
Comments: |
In response to the above we would
refer you to following extract from
the book by Dr. D. C. Ganguly: Some
Aspects of the position of Women in
Ancient India, (Vol 2, Chapter 1 #
37, p.595)
"The practice of using veils by
women, particularly in well-to-do
families, was in vogue.
Prabhakaravardhana’s daughter
Rajyasri put on a veil when she met
her husband, the Maukhari
Grahavarman of Kanauj, for the first
time. It is known from Vacaspati
Misra (9C AD) that women in good
families observed the purdah system
and did not appear in public without
veils ...
However, Dhoyi, the author of the 12
c poetical work the Pavanaduta,
relates that the women of Vijayapura
(in Bengal) did not observe the
purdah system.
"Harsha’s [1099-1101] [Lohara
dynasty] coins [depict] a half
cross-legged goddess [and] a veil
appears on the head" [GuptaCoins
p.39]
"Gangayadeva’s [one of the Kalachuri
rulers of Dahala, the country around
Jabalpur in MP] (1019-1042AD) coins
... the female is shown as having a
veil on her head which hangs down to
the shoulders and upper arms" [GuptaCoins
p.39]
"Many of the female figures on the
gold coins, like the sculpture and
literature of the [Gupta] age, do
reflect a somewhat new idea of
feminine beauty which we now call
classical [thinner and more
slender]"[GuptaCoins p.21] " -
Reza Sami, SC USA - June 21, 2007 |
|
Discussion on this topic is now
closed. |
Return to previous Page |