|
Scarcely
does anyone remember Rupin and Rachana Katyal.
Let me give you a hint: They were married on
December 3rd 1999 in New Delhi and went to
Kathmandu for their honeymoon ? Any recollection
? No ? Let me give you another hint. They flew
Indian Airlines flight IC-814 on December 24th,
1999. Somewhere a bell rings faintly, doesn’t it
? Yes....
Well let me tell you. These two people were
among the ill fated passengers of the Indian
Airlines flight IC-814 that was hijacked by five
Pakistani nationals and was flown first to
Kabul, then to UAE and finally back to Khandahar
in Afghanistan. Rupin Katyal was stabbed and
killed by the kidnappers, making his wife,
Rachana, a widow even before the henna on her
palms had dried. Ultimately, after securing the
release of three terrorists in Indian custody,
the hijackers let the passengers go and blew the
plane up. The Taleban administration did not
lift a finger to intervene in this matter.
America saw this issue as a regional problem,
yawned, turned over and went to sleep. Just two
years earlier, almost to the day, A senior
delegation from the Taleban movement in
Afghanistan had visited the United States on
December 4, 1997 for talks with an international
energy company that wanted to construct a gas
pipeline from Turkmenistan across Afghanistan to
Pakistan.
On the afternoon of December 24, 1999, A vehicle
from the Pakistan embassy had driven to the
Tribhuvan Airport, Kathmandu carrying Pakistani
First Secretary Mohammed Arshad Cheema, his
assistant Zia Ansari and a Nepali Muslim by the
name of Abdul Rias Khan. Two airport officials
noted down their registration number. They also
noticed that the first secretary had a
briefcase. Flaunting their diplomatic immunity,
they walked into the departure lounge unchecked.
The briefcase was handed over to the hijackers.
Nepali airport staff officers contended that
Cheema did not have the briefcase when he left
from the airport.
The three desperados released by India were
later found to be instrumental in the beheading
of NY Times journalist Daniel Pearl. When the
WTC were attacked by the Taleban’s cronies, the
Talebani hemorrhoid, that the US had seen as
afflicting India, also came to hurt its own rear
end. When Bush mentioned that he was happy that
India was going to join as an ally in the war on
terror, the then Prime Minister of India, Atal
Bihari Vajpayee laughed and said, “We have been
fighting this war for 55 years. It is US that is
joining in, not us !”
Even as the War on Terror was waged against
Afghanistan’s Taleban rightly and against Iraq
(less rightly), Pakistan was always touted as ‘A
valuable ally’ in this war. The role of the
Pakistanis as the architect of Taleban was not
hidden from anyone who dared to wander outside
the confining walls of the US media coverage,
but still the Pakistani rogue dog was pampered
publicly and chastised privately by the US. Was
it because this thorn had to be maintained in
India’s side as long as enough cooperation could
be milked out from the Pakistanis ? We don’t
know. It, however, emerged soon that whenever US
put pressure on Pakistan, Musharraf would pull a
rabbit (terrorist) out of the hat and hand him
over to the US. Was it because there was a need
to keep the war going by taking one ‘rabbit’ at
a time ? We don’t know that too, It is for the
reader to decide.
However, today the ghost of Rupin Katyal hovers
over Musharraf’s head as he lies in bed every
morning wondering if that day will be his last
as the head of state in Pakistan, a country that
was born a runt; and which, since its inception,
has begged or blackmailed for every mouthful it
has eaten, exported hatred and terrorism, and,
aside for a short span, was headed by one
blood-thirsty general after the another. Despite
grabbing the most fertile Indus plains, they
remain an anemic festering pus pocket when India
is prospering next doors.
Pakistan is a problem for India. It’s existence
itself is a problem. The foolishness of Jinnah’s
generation must be reversed. A phased
comprehensive plan of making Pakistan secular,
limiting religion, and absorbing it into India
over the next hundred years must be initiated.
|
Comments: |
Wow what a daring idea !!! Absorbing
it (Pakistan) into India over the
next hundred years must be
initiated"
Do we need more trouble than what we
already have in the form of
terrorists in India? Can a country
full of extremist thinking people,
who have been brainwashed into
having a separate religious identity
for the past 100 years be subdued
into submission? One would not want
to take care of lawless fanatic
regions of tribal west Pakistan.
I think a very secure border and a
UN dominated secular Pakistan would
be a better idea. Who would want to
take care of such a troubled state?
If it disintegrates, it would be a
trouble, not just for India, but for
the rest of the whole secular world.
Of course India will have to bear
the brunt the most. The fact is that
a strong state in Pakistan which can
dominate over the growth of
extremist/terrorists elements in
Pakistan is a dire necessity for
India's and world's survival. -
Rakesh Kumar - Mar. 27, 2007 |
|
Discussion on this topic is now
closed. |
Return to previous Page |